That Is NOT a Good Idea!
By Mo Willems
A fox and a goose meet while walking through town, and the predator knows just what to do. The unlikely pair makes its way back to the fox’s house, despite the frantic cries of “That is REALLY not a good idea!” from some baby geese who see right through the plan. The pair cooks up some soup, but it’s missing one ingredient. Surprise, it’s the fox! The goose traps the fox in the pot, and eats the soup for dinner. The baby geese tried to warn him!
Guidelines for Philosophical Discussion
By Lauren Osur and Lily Hartley
Mo Willems’ That Is NOT a Good Idea! uses clever illustrations and word choice to set the reader up for a hilarious plot twist. This book will leave you chuckling, but also asking yourself, “Why did I think the story was going to end this way?”
The illustrations and dialogue are strategically laid out on the pages in a way that sets the reader to fall straight into the same trap the fox did. There is no clear indication of who is saying what, and who the baby geese are talking about/to. Who could have assumed the sweet mother goose was the predator all along? The baby geese’s remark of “Well, we did try to warn him,” at the end of the story just might have you feeling as foolish as the fox.
The author knew that readers would be not only surprised, but also amused by this turn of events. Why did we fall for it? Why did we assume the fox was the predator, and the goose the prey? Why did we assume that the baby geese’s warnings were directed towards the mother goose? This opens up opportunities for dialogue about our assumptions and expectations. The surprise may be due to either ingrained or manufactured bias. On one hand, we know the basics of the animal kingdom, and that a goose would be the prey of a fox, never the reverse. On the other, look at the pictures in That is NOT a Good Idea! Has the illustrator’s presentation of the characters manipulated our perspective? The fox’s sinister hunger as well as the goose’s motherly bonnet and innocent eyes imply a VERY different result. Both options are worth exploration, or perhaps you may develop your own theories.
This book also provides a great chance to study the philosophy of humor. Why is the ending so funny? Maybe we laugh because we think it’s funny to see something bad happen to the fox, who we all had considered the “bad guy.” We see this villain being deceived and we feel a sense of superiority because it happened to him, not us. Things usually aren’t as funny when the joke is on you. In philosophy, this idea is called the Superiority Theory. It suggests that we laugh because we feel smarter than the character who got tricked. If this is the case, would we have laughed if the goose had ended up in the soup? If the fox had indeed trapped the goose, we probably wouldn’t be laughing. So why is it so funny when the roles are reversed? The death of the fox isn’t funny in itself; rather, the entire situation is humorous. Younger kids’ ideas of humor are often limited to traditional jokes and punch lines. This book provides an example of another type of humor - ironic humor. There is a philosophical theory called the Incongruity Theory. It suggests that we find humor in a situation that appears vastly different than what we may have expected, or what logically makes sense. In That Is NOT a Good Idea!, we expected the fox to put the goose in the soup. Foxes are natural predators of birds, so the idea of the fox ending up as the prey is funny to us. This is a good way to introduce and define the topics of logic, humor, and irony to young students.
Questions for Philosophical Discussion
Assumptions and Expectations'''
“What luck!” “Dinner!”
Humor and Irony
“Would you care to visit my nearby kitchen?”