Recent Changes - Search:

Awi Usdi, the Little Deer

By Bruchac and Caduto, Cherokee, North Carolina; Fulcrum Publishing

Summary

Awi Usdi, the Little Deer is a story about respect and responsibility. Hunters and animals lived in peace until the hunters learned to use weapons. The hunters began to hunt all the animals they wanted. Some animals tried to fight back and failed. Now it is up to Awi Usdi, the Little Deer, to make peace between the animals and the hunters once again. How will Awi Usdi get the hunters to show respect for the animals? Maybe if there are some consequences for the hunters, they will learn to live in peace with the animals once again.

Guidelines for Philosophical Discussion

This story comes from Native American culture. There are many Native American tribes, and each tribe has many stories that have been told since long ago to teach important lessons. Awi Usdi, the Little Deer is a story of Cherokee origin. It explains the importance of reciprocity in relationships between humans and other animals to Cherokee culture, and how it came to be that way. Important issues debated in ethics arise from Little Deer’s challenges. A range of philosophical arguments attempt to address these issues. In this story, animals are in danger of becoming extinct due to excessive hunting. Animals meet in counsel to figure out how to stop the hunters from threatening the continuance of the various species. After attempts by bears and other animals to resist the hunters, Awi Usdi, The Little Deer is their last hope. Awi Usdi speaks to the hunters, giving them an ultimatum: hunt responsibly and respectfully or you will be punished. The hunters agree to hunt only for sustenance and the animals were no longer endangered.

A central theme in the story is animal rights and human responsibility. One argument in ethics claims that animals have the same natural rights to life and non-molestation as humans. From this perspective, it is morally wrong to take the life of an animal for human use, including food. This position contends that there simply is no need for killing or eating animals, and that a view that holds otherwise is an expression of speciesism. Another argument concerning animal rights and human responsibility states that it is all but insulting to attempt to attribute the same rights to animals and humans. This position holds that animals do not have intrinsic value. The claim here is that only beings with intrinsic worth have rights, so non-human animals do not have rights. In fact, some versions of this view claim that the value of some animals is purely in terms of how useful they are to humans, including aesthetically. Yet a third argument debated is one that more closely resembles that apparent in the story than the other two presented herein. This argument claims that it is for the sake of the deer and the diversity of the ecosystem that deer populations ought to be controlled by humans. The premise is that humans are morally obligated to preserve and maintain a diverse ecosystem. If that is the case, this position argues that humans are morally obligated to prevent overpopulation of a single species that can threaten both the diversity at stake and survival of their own species. Awi Usdi provides a middle way by offering an ethic of reciprocity, while considering some points made by differing views compatible.

The final topic in Awi Usdi is human responsibility in terms of non-human species endangerment. The story provides a platform for discussing threats caused by humans to the survival of other species. Some argue that humans are naturally superior to animals in such a way that the natural course is to let animals be subject to humans. Consequently, if animals become endangered as a result of human activity, it is just as it was meant to be. Others argue that it is morally obligatory to maintain ecological equilibrium, so humans must actively promote the survival of non-human animals. From this view, human-generated threats to other species are morally irresponsible. In this sense, it is by virtue of distinctly human characteristics that humans are morally obligated to prevent species endangerment caused by humans. In other words, theories that champion human superiority make the claim that animals don’t have the same rights as humans based on human rationality, technology, and language. Applied to this argument, however, it is these very characteristics that obligate humans to save other species from human-crafted extinction.

Questions for Philosophical Discussion

Necessity vs. Desire

The animals got worried when the hunters started using more than they needed, just because they wanted to: "They began to kill animals when they did not need them for food or clothing"

  1. What are some examples of things we need?
  2. What are some examples of things we want but might not need?
  3. What is the difference between wanting something and needing something?
  4. Can you always get what you want? Why? Why not?
  5. Is it ok to take whatever you want? Why? Why not?
  6. Do people need animals? If so, in what ways?
  7. Are there reasons people want animals but don't need them?
  8. Are you allowed to have any animal you want as a pet? As food? As clothing? Why? Why not?

Authority

The animals couldn’t protect themselves against the hunters.

  1. If someone can't protect themselves, like a baby, how do you treat them? Why?
  2. If an animal can't protect itself, like a baby bunny, how do you treat it? Why?
  3. If you are stronger or bigger than someone else, can you treat that person however you want? Why/Why not?
  4. If you are stronger or bigger than an animal can you treat the animal however you want? Why/Why not?

Animal Rights and Human Responsibility

Little Deer and the other animals want the hunters to respect them, not to stop hunting: "Respect us and hunt us only when there is real need."

  1. How do you show respect to your teachers? Parents? Friends?
  2. Is it important to be respectful? Why? Why Not?
  3. What are examples of being disrespectful?
  4. Is it important to be respectful to animals? Why? Why not?
  5. Can people be disrespectful to animals? How?
  6. What are some ways we can show respect to animals?

Human Threats to Ecological Biodiversity

The hunters had weapons that the animals did not have and the animals are afraid they will become extinct.

  1. What are the animals afraid of?
  2. What does it mean to be extinct?
  3. What is an endangered species?
  4. Can humans cause animals to become endangered or extinct? How? (overhunting, poaching, pollution, destroying habitats, etc)
  5. Have any animals become extinct because of humans? Examples. (Tazmanian Tiger extinct since 1936:intensive hunting/habitat encroachment by people, Caspian Tiger since 1970, Cascade Mountains Wolf since 1940, etc.)
  6. What are some animals that are endangered because of humans? (tigers: poaching, rainforest animals: deforestation, bald eagle, etc.)
  7. Think about the hunters in the story. What did they do that helped the endangered animals survive?
  8. What can people do to save endangered species?
  9. Is it important to help endangered species? Why? Why Not?
  10. What would be different if there were no animals left in the world?
  11. Would it be good/bad? Why?

This book module deals with multiculturalism and ethics, specifically animal rights?. It is appropriate for intermediate philosophers. You can buy this book on Amazon.

Creative Commons License This website was developed with the assistance of the Squire Family Foundation.